NSI vs. EMM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NSI (National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF) and EMM (Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. NSI is passively managed, while EMM is actively managed. Over the past year, NSI returned 29.12% vs 39.26% for EMM. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NSI charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMM.

Performance

NSI vs. EMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSI achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than EMM's 20.39% return.

NSI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 4.40%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.82%

EMM

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -5.50%
• 6M: 12.37%
• YTD: 20.39%
• 1Y: 39.26%
• 3Y*: 16.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	$252.31K	$295.99K	$449.48K
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF	$107.28K	$63.13K	$59.69K

NSI vs. EMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF	12.00%	35.94%	-1.21%	4.94%
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	20.39%	30.21%	2.34%	6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NSI and EMM is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.86

The correlation between NSI and EMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

NSI vs. EMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NSI	EMM
Technology	32.1%	48.1%
Financial Services	19.6%	20.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	2.6%
Communication Services	7.6%	1.7%
Basic Materials	6.4%	3.8%
Industrials	4.1%	9.9%
Healthcare	2.6%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.3%
Energy	1.2%	4.5%
Utilities	1.0%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.6%

Return for Risk

NSI vs. EMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NSI

NSI Risk / Return Rank: 55
NSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
NSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NSI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NSI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

EMM

EMM Risk / Return Rank: 62
EMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EMM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EMM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NSI vs. EMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NSI	EMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.44	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.99	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.19	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	7.68	-1.17

NSI vs. EMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the EMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSI and EMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NSI vs. EMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSI drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum EMM drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSI and EMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSI	EMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-21.99%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-17.62%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.15%	-12.87%	+6.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-4.84%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	5.00%	-0.71%

Volatility

NSI vs. EMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is 7.62%, while Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that NSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSI	EMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	10.56%	-2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.74%	24.68%	-5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	26.65%	-5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	20.48%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	20.48%	-1.42%

NSI vs. EMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EMM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSI vs. EMM - Dividend Comparison

NSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than EMM's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	0.79%	0.90%	0.80%	0.66%
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF	1.23%	1.69%	3.39%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSI and EMM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, NSI and EMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NSI or EMM?

EMM has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to NSI (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSI dropped -18.77% vs EMM's -21.99%.

Which ETF is better, NSI or EMM?

On 1-year performance, EMM leads with 39.26% vs 29.12% for NSI. On fees, EMM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NSI has been the lower-risk option at 7.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NSI or EMM?

Over the 1-year period, EMM has performed better with a 39.26% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NSI or EMM?

EMM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NSI or EMM?

NSI has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.79% for EMM.

What is the main difference between NSI and EMM?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NSI and 0.75% for EMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.