NSI vs. BBEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NSI (National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF) and BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - NSI tracks the Alerian National Security Emerging Markets Index while BBEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NSI returned 42.48% vs 53.50% for BBEM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSI charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBEM.

Performance

NSI vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSI achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly lower than BBEM's 27.02% return.

NSI

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 17.45%
• 6M: 19.18%
• 1Y: 42.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.46%
• YTD: 27.02%
• 6M: 29.37%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 23.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSI vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF	17.45%	35.94%	-1.21%	4.68%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.02%	32.43%	5.61%	4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NSI and BBEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023	0.93

The correlation between NSI and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

NSI vs. BBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NSI	BBEM
Technology	34.0%	36.5%
Financial Services	20.2%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	10.0%
Communication Services	10.1%	6.7%
Basic Materials	8.0%	6.2%
Energy	3.9%	4.2%
Industrials	2.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	2.9%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	3.0%
Utilities	1.5%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.0%

Return for Risk

NSI vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSI

NSI Risk / Return Rank: 67
NSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NSI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NSI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSI vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSI	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.76	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.64	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	4.10	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.55	16.16	-4.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSI vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSI and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSI	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.76	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	1.32	-0.08

Drawdowns

NSI vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSI drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSI and BBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSI	BBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-17.42%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-13.12%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.31%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.70%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	3.32%	+0.37%

Volatility

NSI vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is 7.13%, while JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that NSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSI	BBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	8.59%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.60%	17.20%	-1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	19.49%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.22%	17.50%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	17.50%	+0.72%

NSI vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSI vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

NSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than BBEM's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.59%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF	1.17%	1.69%	3.39%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSI and BBEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, NSI and BBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NSI or BBEM?

BBEM has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to NSI (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSI dropped -18.77% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, NSI or BBEM?

On 1-year performance, BBEM leads with 53.50% vs 42.48% for NSI. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NSI has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NSI or BBEM?

Over the 1-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 53.50% return vs 42.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NSI or BBEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NSI or BBEM?

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.17% for NSI.

What is the main difference between NSI and BBEM?

NSI tracks Alerian National Security Emerging Markets Index, while BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NSI and 0.15% for BBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.