PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSGRX vs. NOSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSGRX achieves a 15.64% return, which is significantly higher than NOSGX's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NSGRX has outperformed NOSGX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while NOSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.37% annualized return.


NSGRX

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.40%
YTD
15.64%
6M
14.72%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.76%

NOSGX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
14.73%
6M
14.12%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
15.64%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
14.73%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NSGRX and NOSGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1999

0.94

The correlation between NSGRX and NOSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSGRX vs. NOSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSGRXNOSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

3.80

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

13.13

+0.99

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the NOSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSGRX and NOSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSGRXNOSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.94

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.27

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.34

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSGRX drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, which is greater than NOSGX's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSGRX and NOSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSGRXNOSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-56.92%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.07%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-28.13%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-28.34%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.37%

-45.66%

+5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.54%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-9.05%

-13.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.60%

-0.15%

Volatility

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) have volatilities of 5.01% and 4.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSGRXNOSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.86%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

11.82%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

17.85%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.36%

23.85%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

24.56%

-1.18%

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSGRX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than NOSGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSGRX vs. NOSGX - Dividend Comparison

NSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%, less than NOSGX's 38.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
38.34%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
13.71%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NSGRX and NOSGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NSGRX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to NOSGX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSGRX dropped -64.89% vs NOSGX's -56.92%.

NOSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSGRX and NOSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer