NSDVX vs. FCPVX
NSDVX (North Star Dividend Fund) and FCPVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX returned 7.34%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for FCPVX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSDVX charges 1.37%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FCPVX.
Performance
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSDVX achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 23.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX has underperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
NSDVX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
FCPVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 23.80%
- 6M
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 17.74% | -1.31% | 9.25% | 8.06% | -6.36% | 16.16% | 6.51% | 16.13% | -12.35% | 8.27% |
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 23.80% | 8.13% | 9.41% | 17.77% | -13.07% | 38.08% | 11.18% | 20.86% | -15.47% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSDVX and FCPVX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NSDVX and FCPVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSDVX vs. FCPVX — Risk / Return Rank
NSDVX
FCPVX
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSDVX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.99 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 13.97 | -7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and FCPVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSDVX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -57.65% | +19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -10.31% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.41% | -23.81% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -23.81% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | -44.59% | +5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | 0.00% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -7.95% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.94% | +0.63% |
Volatility
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that NSDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSDVX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.84% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 13.38% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 18.22% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 20.98% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 22.40% | -4.68% |
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSDVX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison
NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FCPVX's 8.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 8.20% | 10.15% | 6.13% | 5.20% | 5.92% | 7.95% | 0.46% | 3.49% | 36.44% | 3.64% | 7.12% | 11.09% |
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 2.83% | 3.45% | 7.00% | 2.52% | 6.57% | 3.31% | 1.52% | 2.64% | 6.87% | 2.48% | 4.67% | 3.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSDVX and FCPVX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCPVX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to NSDVX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs FCPVX's -57.65%.
FCPVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSDVX and FCPVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer