NSCI vs. IMTG
NSCI (Nuveen Securitized Income ETF) and IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NSCI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for IMTG.
Performance
NSCI vs. IMTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NSCI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NSCI vs. IMTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NSCI Nuveen Securitized Income ETF | 0.91% |
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSCI and IMTG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSCI vs. IMTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Securitized Income ETF (NSCI) and Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSCI vs. IMTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSCI drawdown since its inception was -1.10%, smaller than the maximum IMTG drawdown of -2.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCI and IMTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSCI | IMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -2.85% | +1.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.68% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -1.37% | +1.20% |
Volatility
NSCI vs. IMTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSCI | IMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30% | 4.69% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 4.69% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 4.69% | -3.39% |
NSCI vs. IMTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSCI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTG's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSCI vs. IMTG - Dividend Comparison
NSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than IMTG's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% |
NSCI Nuveen Securitized Income ETF | 3.04% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSCI and IMTG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NSCI.
NSCI has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.28% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NSCI and 0.22% for IMTG.
Find the right allocation for NSCI and IMTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer