PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSC vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSC vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSC achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than CVX's 25.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NSC has outperformed CVX with an annualized return of 16.62%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.


NSC

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
9.68%
6M
6.63%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
16.62%

CVX

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
25.18%
6M
27.20%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSC vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
9.68%25.65%1.55%-1.63%-15.59%27.26%24.76%32.39%5.22%36.85%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
25.18%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NSC and CVX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2001

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between NSC and CVX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

NSC:

$15.83

CVX:

$5.75

PE Ratio

NSC:

19.83

CVX:

32.54

PEG Ratio

NSC:

3.01

CVX:

3.17

PS Ratio

NSC:

4.34

CVX:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSC:

$12.19B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSC:

$6.23B

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

NSC:

$5.20B

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSC vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSC
NSC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSC vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSCCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.48

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

6.10

+0.43

NSC vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSC and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSC vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSC drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSC and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSCCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.74%

-55.77%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-13.99%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.11%

-20.64%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-24.95%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-55.77%

+11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-10.52%

+6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-11.39%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

5.68%

-1.51%

Volatility

NSC vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 7.62%. This indicates that NSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSCCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

7.62%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

17.86%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

22.06%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.05%

25.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.53%

29.16%

-1.63%

Dividends

NSC vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

NSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than CVX's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.73%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
1.72%1.87%2.30%2.28%2.01%1.40%1.58%1.85%2.03%1.68%2.18%2.79%

Financials

NSC vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Norfolk Southern Corporation and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
47.56B
(NSC) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSC vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Norfolk Southern Corporation and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
66.8%
9.6%
Portfolio components
NSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

NSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported an operating income of 877.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

NSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a net income of 547.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NSC and CVX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSC has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to CVX (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSC dropped -67.74% vs CVX's -55.77%.

CVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSC and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer