NSBRX vs. FCBYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NSBRX (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund) and FCBYX (Nuveen Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - NSBRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nuveen, while FCBYX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX returned 12.76%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for FCBYX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NSBRX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FCBYX.

Performance

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than FCBYX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has outperformed FCBYX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while FCBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.

NSBRX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 3.36%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

FCBYX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund	3.56%	10.03%	17.56%	15.08%	-9.63%	27.17%	9.79%	41.88%	-4.36%	20.07%
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	1.17%	8.55%	6.86%	9.14%	-10.36%	1.47%	8.45%	13.18%	-3.07%	5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NSBRX and FCBYX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2006	0.12

The correlation between NSBRX and FCBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NSBRX vs. FCBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBRX

NSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 18
NSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FCBYX

FCBYX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FCBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FCBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FCBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FCBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FCBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSBRX	FCBYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.56	-1.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	4.50	-2.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.58	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	3.02	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	10.13	-4.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the FCBYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBRX and FCBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSBRX	FCBYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	2.56	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.74	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	1.02	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.08	-0.48

Drawdowns

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than FCBYX's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and FCBYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSBRX	FCBYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.14%	-24.49%	-20.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-2.39%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.89%	-4.75%	-10.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.79%	-15.74%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.69%	-15.93%	-17.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.37%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-2.41%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	0.71%	+1.47%

Volatility

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) at 1.02%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSBRX	FCBYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	1.02%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	2.10%	+5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.79%	2.81%	+6.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	4.13%	+10.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	4.22%	+12.37%

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBYX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Dividend Comparison

NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, more than FCBYX's 5.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	5.38%	6.22%	6.44%	5.59%	4.71%	3.08%	3.58%	3.69%	3.91%	4.92%	5.28%	5.53%
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund	11.67%	9.26%	6.82%	3.01%	3.58%	3.67%	4.68%	15.68%	7.04%	4.57%	1.75%	6.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSBRX and FCBYX in my portfolio?

NSBRX and FCBYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSBRX or FCBYX?

NSBRX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to FCBYX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs FCBYX's -24.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.