NSBRX vs. FCBYX
NSBRX (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund) and FCBYX (Nuveen Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - NSBRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nuveen, while FCBYX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX returned 12.68%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for FCBYX. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NSBRX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FCBYX.
Performance
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than FCBYX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has outperformed FCBYX with an annualized return of 12.68%, while FCBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.99% annualized return.
NSBRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
FCBYX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 5.21% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 0.96% | 8.55% | 6.86% | 9.14% | -10.36% | 1.47% | 8.45% | 13.18% | -3.07% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSBRX and FCBYX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2006 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, NSBRX and FCBYX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSBRX vs. FCBYX — Risk / Return Rank
NSBRX
FCBYX
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSBRX | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.98 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 6.44 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than FCBYX's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and FCBYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSBRX | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -24.49% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -2.39% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.89% | -4.16% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.79% | -15.74% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -15.93% | -17.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.59% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -2.39% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.73% | +1.51% |
Volatility
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) at 0.67%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSBRX | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 0.67% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 2.13% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 2.74% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 4.14% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 4.19% | +12.37% |
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBYX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSBRX vs. FCBYX - Dividend Comparison
NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than FCBYX's 5.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 5.26% | 6.22% | 6.44% | 5.59% | 4.71% | 3.08% | 3.58% | 3.69% | 3.91% | 4.92% | 5.28% | 5.53% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 11.45% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSBRX and FCBYX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSBRX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FCBYX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs FCBYX's -24.49%.
FCBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSBRX and FCBYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer