NRSH vs. CNAV
NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NRSH is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, NRSH returned 58.80% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NRSH charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
NRSH vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NRSH having a 47.92% return and CNAV slightly lower at 47.26%.
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 47.26%
- 6M
- 48.02%
- 1Y
- 72.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -7.78% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 47.26% | 16.80% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRSH and CNAV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between NRSH and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRSH vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
NRSH
CNAV
NRSH vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRSH | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.91 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.11 | 3.62 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | 5.63 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.86 | 24.09 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRSH | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.91 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.62 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
NRSH vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRSH | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -30.06% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -12.97% | +2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -5.42% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.02% | +0.48% |
Volatility
NRSH vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) is 9.21%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that NRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRSH | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | 12.28% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | 21.02% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 25.08% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 27.16% | -5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 27.16% | -5.62% |
NRSH vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRSH vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRSH and CNAV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to NRSH (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRSH dropped -24.01% vs CNAV's -30.06%.
On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 58.80% for NRSH. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NRSH has been the lower-risk option at 9.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 58.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 1.31% for CNAV.
CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRSH and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer