NRSH vs. BUFH
NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRSH is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NRSH charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
NRSH vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 47.92% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 8.07% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRSH and BUFH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRSH vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
NRSH
BUFH
NRSH vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRSH | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRSH | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 2.91 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
NRSH vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRSH | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -1.53% | -22.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -0.18% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | — | — |
Volatility
NRSH vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRSH | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 2.37% | +22.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 2.37% | +19.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 2.37% | +19.17% |
NRSH vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRSH vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRSH and BUFH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
NRSH is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for NRSH and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer