PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRO vs. FSRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRO vs. FSRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRO achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than FSRNX's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NRO has outperformed FSRNX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while FSRNX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.55% annualized return.


NRO

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.26%
6M
7.85%
YTD
6.81%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
4.34%
ALL TIME*
3.99%

FSRNX

1D
-1.24%
1M
1.38%
6M
11.50%
YTD
14.40%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
3.55%
ALL TIME*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$782.35K$1.08M$899.31K

NRO vs. FSRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRO
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund
6.81%0.85%23.87%15.24%-35.04%29.26%-10.88%47.57%-16.37%13.29%
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
14.40%3.03%4.99%11.93%-26.14%40.66%-11.31%23.78%-4.91%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NRO and FSRNX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.69

The correlation between NRO and FSRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRO vs. FSRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRO
NRO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRNX
FSRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FSRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRO vs. FSRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NROFSRNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.65

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

5.37

-3.99

NRO vs. FSRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FSRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRO and FSRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRO vs. FSRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRO drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, which is greater than FSRNX's maximum drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRO and FSRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NROFSRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-44.26%

-48.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-8.47%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-17.49%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.35%

-34.27%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.59%

-44.26%

-18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-1.45%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-9.60%

-17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.61%

+1.72%

Volatility

NRO vs. FSRNX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund (NRO) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NROFSRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.46%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

10.84%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

14.01%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

18.97%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.40%

21.45%

+4.95%

Dividends

NRO vs. FSRNX - Dividend Comparison

NRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than FSRNX's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
2.59%2.77%2.86%2.84%2.66%1.25%3.33%4.52%3.62%2.27%3.40%2.57%
NRO
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund
12.40%12.27%10.55%11.74%11.96%7.10%10.88%8.60%12.77%9.31%7.64%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRO and FSRNX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRNX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to NRO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRO dropped -92.91% vs FSRNX's -44.26%.

FSRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRO and FSRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer