NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO
NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L returned 9.77%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -16.00% return. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L has underperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 9.77%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
NRJL.L
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 38.38%
- 6M
- 37.58%
- 1Y
- 79.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -20.54%
- YTD
- -16.00%
- 6M
- -21.44%
- 1Y
- 69.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 38.38% | 35.47% | -11.56% | -22.87% | -8.74% | -5.40% | 33.09% | 47.31% | -7.75% | 15.17% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -16.00% | 126.67% | 22.52% | -5.26% | 15.42% | -12.16% | 43.05% | 9.64% | -4.59% | -4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRJL.L and SVR-C.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, NRJL.L and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NRJL.L
SVR-C.TO
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NRJL.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.25 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.92 | 1.44 | +6.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.54 | 3.19 | +25.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRJL.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.56% | -60.18% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | -48.72% | +38.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -48.72% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.10% | -48.72% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.56% | -48.72% | -5.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -47.15% | +43.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -32.00% | +8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 21.98% | -19.22% |
Volatility
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 9.59%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRJL.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 14.65% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 54.74% | -37.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 57.51% | -36.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 35.57% | -13.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 31.86% | -10.54% |
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRJL.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while SVR-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.30% | 0.42% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.70% | 1.02% | 0.59% | 0.79% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRJL.L and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NRJL.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NRJL.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
NRJL.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for NRJL.L and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer