NRJL.L vs. SLVP

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L returned 9.77%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.

Performance

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -8.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NRJL.L having a 9.77% annualized return and SLVP not far ahead at 9.89%.

NRJL.L

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 38.38%
• 6M: 37.58%
• 1Y: 79.01%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 2.89%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

SLVP

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -15.08%
• YTD: -8.07%
• 6M: -9.68%
• 1Y: 83.36%
• 3Y*: 47.08%
• 5Y*: 17.12%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	38.38%	35.47%	-11.56%	-22.87%	-8.74%	-5.40%	33.09%	47.31%	-7.75%	15.17%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	-8.07%	181.27%	16.47%	-7.19%	-8.31%	-22.81%	51.85%	32.47%	-17.48%	-4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NRJL.L and SLVP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.17

The correlation between NRJL.L and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRJL.L	SLVP
Industrials	39.4%	-
Utilities	32.9%	-
Technology	16.7%	-
Basic Materials	10.8%	99.8%
Energy	4.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NRJL.L vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRJL.L

NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SLVP

SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 42
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRJL.L	SLVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.73	1.57	+2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	1.99	+2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.26	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.92	2.23	+5.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.54	5.45	+23.09

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRJL.L and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -78.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and SLVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRJL.L	SLVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.56%	-78.11%	+23.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-37.55%	+27.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.16%	-37.55%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.10%	-45.29%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.56%	-60.02%	+5.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-33.64%	+30.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.11%	-39.08%	+15.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	15.34%	-12.58%

Volatility

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 9.59%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 18.44%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRJL.L	SLVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	18.44%	-8.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	43.71%	-26.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	53.36%	-32.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.92%	40.32%	-18.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.32%	40.33%	-19.01%

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRJL.L vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than SLVP's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.30%	0.42%	0.73%	0.77%	0.24%	0.32%	0.70%	1.02%	0.59%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	2.28%	1.78%	1.05%	0.88%	0.63%	1.63%	2.39%	2.03%	1.28%	0.85%	2.32%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRJL.L and SLVP in my portfolio?

NRJL.L and SLVP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NRJL.L or SLVP?

On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRJL.L or SLVP?

SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.

What is the main difference between NRJL.L and SLVP?

NRJL.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SLVP is Silver. NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.39% for SLVP.