NRGU vs. XTAP
NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGU is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past year, NRGU returned 156.99% vs 21.00% for XTAP. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRGU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
NRGU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 129.31% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.96% return.
NRGU
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 129.31%
- 6M
- 97.01%
- 1Y
- 156.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 129.31% | -33.00% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 14.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGU and XTAP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.12 |
The correlation between NRGU and XTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NRGU vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRGU
XTAP
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
NRGU
XTAP
Basic Materials
NRGU
-
XTAP
Communication Services
NRGU
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
NRGU
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
NRGU
-
XTAP
Financial Services
NRGU
-
XTAP
Healthcare
NRGU
-
XTAP
Industrials
NRGU
-
XTAP
Real Estate
NRGU
-
XTAP
Technology
NRGU
-
XTAP
Utilities
NRGU
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRGU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
NRGU
XTAP
NRGU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRGU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 2.22 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 14.82 | -10.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 78.70 | -68.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRGU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 4.50 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.80 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
NRGU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.50% | -22.13% | -35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.95% | -1.42% | -38.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.91% | -0.21% | -20.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -3.45% | -21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.96% | 0.27% | +15.69% |
Volatility
NRGU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 31.63% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRGU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.63% | 1.10% | +30.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.27% | 3.16% | +58.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.15% | 4.70% | +70.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.15% | 14.54% | +74.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.15% | 14.41% | +74.74% |
NRGU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRGU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NRGU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NRGU and XTAP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGU has higher volatility (31.63%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.99% vs 21.00% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.99% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.
NRGU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRGU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer