PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 157.14% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 0.31% return.


NRGU

1D
2.86%
1M
51.26%
6M
91.25%
YTD
157.14%
1Y
166.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.40%

VTEB

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.84%
6M
-0.23%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.88%
ALL TIME*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.57M$4.13M$3.95M
$377.87M$352.76M$360.69M

NRGU vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and VTEB is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.20

The correlation between NRGU and VTEB shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGU vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGUVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.00

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

6.62

+0.97

NRGU vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, which is greater than VTEB's maximum drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-17.00%

-40.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-2.71%

-41.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

-1.86%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-2.30%

-23.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

0.82%

+18.73%

Volatility

NRGU vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 22.83% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.88%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.83%

0.88%

+21.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.33%

2.22%

+62.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.39%

2.79%

+74.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.47%

3.92%

+84.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.47%

5.25%

+83.22%

NRGU vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGU vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.14%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and VTEB have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (22.83%) compared to VTEB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 166.43% vs 4.77% for VTEB. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 166.43% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VTEB is Municipal Bonds. NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 0.03% for VTEB.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer