PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. VSDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. VSDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 75.49% return, which is significantly higher than VSDB's 0.95% return.


NRGU

1D
5.64%
1M
-22.47%
YTD
75.49%
6M
77.93%
1Y
61.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VSDB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU vs. VSDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and VSDB is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. VSDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VSDB
VSDB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VSDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU vs. VSDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGUVSDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.56

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.35

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

14.67

-11.09

NRGU vs. VSDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the VSDB Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and VSDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. VSDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, which is greater than VSDB's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and VSDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUVSDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-1.42%

-56.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.71%

-1.42%

-41.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.48%

-0.26%

-39.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-0.19%

-25.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.39%

0.32%

+17.07%

Volatility

NRGU vs. VSDB - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) at 0.52%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUVSDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.45%

0.52%

+26.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.96%

1.39%

+61.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.67%

1.75%

+74.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.31%

1.90%

+87.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.31%

1.90%

+87.41%

NRGU vs. VSDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VSDB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGU vs. VSDB - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and VSDB have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to VSDB (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs VSDB's -1.42%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 61.72% vs 4.75% for VSDB. On fees, VSDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VSDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 61.72% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

VSDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VSDB is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 0.15% for VSDB.

VSDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and VSDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer