PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. UBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. UBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 147.63% return, which is significantly higher than UBOT's -14.56% return.


NRGU

1D
4.67%
1M
49.07%
6M
118.31%
YTD
147.63%
1Y
143.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.61%

UBOT

1D
3.58%
1M
-18.55%
6M
-18.05%
YTD
-14.56%
1Y
-1.35%
3Y*
-0.24%
5Y*
-10.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU vs. UBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and UBOT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.00

The correlation between NRGU and UBOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NRGU vs. UBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRGU
UBOT

Energy

100.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Industrials

-

50.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

30.8%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Energy

NRGU
100.0%
UBOT
0.5%

Basic Materials

NRGU

-

UBOT
0.0%

Communication Services

NRGU

-

UBOT
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NRGU

-

UBOT
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

NRGU

-

UBOT
0.0%

Financial Services

NRGU

-

UBOT
0.9%

Healthcare

NRGU

-

UBOT
8.0%

Industrials

NRGU

-

UBOT
50.8%

Real Estate

NRGU

-

UBOT

-

Technology

NRGU

-

UBOT
30.8%

Utilities

NRGU

-

UBOT
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. UBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

UBOT
UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU vs. UBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGUUBOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.04

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.04

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.10

+7.45

NRGU vs. UBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the UBOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and UBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. UBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum UBOT drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and UBOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUUBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-86.24%

+28.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-35.90%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-58.63%

+44.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.98%

-49.86%

+23.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.63%

13.95%

+5.68%

Volatility

NRGU vs. UBOT - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) at 19.42%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUUBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.33%

19.42%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.72%

42.46%

+21.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.11%

52.53%

+24.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.94%

53.88%

+35.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.94%

63.57%

+25.37%

NRGU vs. UBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than UBOT's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGU vs. UBOT - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
1.15%0.78%1.45%0.65%0.00%2.25%15.83%0.55%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and UBOT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to UBOT (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs UBOT's -86.24%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 143.73% vs -1.35% for UBOT. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UBOT has been the lower-risk option at 19.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 143.73% return vs -1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UBOT is Robotics. NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 1.29% for UBOT.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and UBOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer