PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. TYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. TYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 147.63% return, which is significantly higher than TYD's -8.67% return.


NRGU

1D
4.67%
1M
49.07%
6M
118.31%
YTD
147.63%
1Y
143.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.61%

TYD

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.38%
6M
-6.39%
YTD
-8.67%
1Y
-3.97%
3Y*
-4.77%
5Y*
-14.54%
10Y*
-5.55%
ALL TIME*
0.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU vs. TYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and TYD is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. TYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TYD
TYD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU vs. TYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGUTYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.96

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.29

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.64

+7.99

NRGU vs. TYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the TYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and TYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. TYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum TYD drawdown of -64.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and TYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUTYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-64.28%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-13.54%

-30.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-60.31%

+45.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.98%

-22.22%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.63%

6.24%

+13.39%

Volatility

NRGU vs. TYD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) at 3.93%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUTYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.33%

3.93%

+18.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.72%

10.30%

+53.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.11%

13.80%

+63.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.94%

22.92%

+66.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.94%

20.20%

+68.74%

NRGU vs. TYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TYD's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGU vs. TYD - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X
3.38%2.97%3.10%2.71%0.55%0.00%9.80%0.92%1.10%0.01%6.84%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and TYD have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to TYD (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs TYD's -64.28%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 143.73% vs -3.97% for TYD. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 143.73% return vs -3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TYD.

TYD has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TYD is Leveraged Bonds. NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while TYD tracks NYSE 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 1.09% for TYD.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and TYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer