PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU.TO achieves a 48.99% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 74.01% return.


NRGU.TO

1D
-0.51%
1M
-15.98%
YTD
48.99%
6M
47.81%
1Y
91.01%
3Y*
33.54%
5Y*
39.04%
10Y*
3.88%

CHPS.TO

1D
4.14%
1M
13.32%
YTD
74.01%
6M
73.30%
1Y
120.10%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
30.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NRGU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF
48.99%21.43%16.67%-5.38%96.21%30.91%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
74.01%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

0.21

The correlation between NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU.TO
NRGU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NRGU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGU.TOCHPS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

9.21

-6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

26.33

-16.61

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than CHPS.TO's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGU.TOCHPS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-48.16%

-51.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.71%

-13.35%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.12%

-37.49%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-48.16%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.78%

0.00%

-87.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.54%

-13.78%

-69.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

4.63%

+4.77%

Volatility

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) is 16.68%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 18.23%. This indicates that NRGU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGU.TOCHPS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

18.23%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.33%

29.35%

+10.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.14%

35.87%

+11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.20%

34.86%

+22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.50%

34.78%

+31.72%

Dividends

NRGU.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison

NRGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
NRGU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CHPS.TO is Semiconductors.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU.TO and CHPS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer