NRGD vs. BRKW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. NRGD is passively managed, while BRKW is actively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -73.89% vs 1.43% for BRKW. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

NRGD vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -71.23% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -3.25% return.

NRGD

• 1D: -12.87%
• 1M: -11.15%
• 6M: -67.30%
• YTD: -71.23%
• 1Y: -73.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: -2.55%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 1Y: 1.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-71.23%	-16.98%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-3.25%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and BRKW is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.01

NRGD vs. BRKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRGD	BRKW
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 10
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRGD	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	0.08	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.88	0.23	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.03	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	0.11	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	0.23	-1.71

NRGD vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the BRKW Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and BRKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-12.64%	-77.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.53%	-12.64%	-65.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.44%	-6.33%	-83.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-5.47%	-55.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.95%	6.27%	+43.68%

Volatility

NRGD vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a higher volatility of 26.28% compared to Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) at 5.17%. This indicates that NRGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.28%	5.17%	+21.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.05%	13.17%	+46.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.76%	17.26%	+58.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.65%	17.26%	+71.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.65%	17.26%	+71.39%

NRGD vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.53%.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.53%	14.45%
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and BRKW in my portfolio?

NRGD and BRKW have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRGD or BRKW?

NRGD has higher volatility (26.28%) compared to BRKW (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -89.64% vs BRKW's -12.64%.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or BRKW?

On 1-year performance, BRKW leads with 1.43% vs -73.89% for NRGD. On fees, NRGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BRKW has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRGD or BRKW?

Over the 1-year period, BRKW has performed better with a 1.43% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or BRKW?

NRGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.53%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.

What is the main difference between NRGD and BRKW?

NRGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.99% for BRKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.