PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRG vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRG vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRG achieves a -19.30% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -16.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NRG has outperformed MSTR with an annualized return of 26.54%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.08% annualized return.


NRG

1D
-1.15%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
-19.30%
6M
-21.70%
1Y
-17.17%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
31.87%
10Y*
26.54%

MSTR

1D
5.61%
1M
-32.19%
YTD
-16.29%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-66.03%
3Y*
65.16%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
21.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRG vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-19.30%78.91%78.58%69.36%-23.47%18.54%-2.14%0.69%39.59%133.69%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.29%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NRG and MSTR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2003

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NRG:

$26.56B

MSTR:

$42.47B

EPS

NRG:

$1.21

MSTR:

-$40.19

PS Ratio

NRG:

0.78

MSTR:

79.74

PB Ratio

NRG:

6.29

MSTR:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRG:

$32.38B

MSTR:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRG:

$4.69B

MSTR:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

NRG:

$2.57B

MSTR:

$466.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRG vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRG vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRGMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.82

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.86

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.27

-0.04

NRG vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRG and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRGMSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

-0.94

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.22

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.29

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.12

+0.23

Drawdowns

NRG vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRG drawdown since its inception was -79.41%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRG and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.41%

-99.86%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.57%

-76.53%

+43.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-77.42%

+44.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

-84.11%

+51.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.76%

-89.27%

+40.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.39%

-73.15%

+42.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.00%

-86.47%

+58.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.14%

52.19%

-39.05%

Volatility

NRG vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) is 13.75%, while Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a volatility of 21.43%. This indicates that NRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

21.43%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

56.80%

-22.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.45%

70.82%

-26.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.91%

90.87%

-50.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.24%

73.77%

-34.53%

Dividends

NRG vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.43%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%

Financials

NRG vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NRG Energy, Inc. and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.26B
124.30M
(NRG) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NRG and MSTR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to NRG (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRG dropped -79.41% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

NRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRG and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer