NRFYX vs. LSGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX).
NRFYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Aug 30, 2000. LSGRX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on May 16, 1991.
Performance
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRFYX Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund | 1.60% | 7.51% | 1.47% | 13.42% | -25.75% | 28.33% | -5.50% | 24.32% | -4.52% | 3.78% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -11.62% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRFYX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NRFYX has underperformed LSGRX with an annualized return of 3.45%, while LSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.
NRFYX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
LSGRX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -11.62%
- 6M
- -12.10%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRFYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NRFYX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
NRFYX
LSGRX
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRFYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | -0.12 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | -0.36 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRFYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.51 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.75 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.43 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between NRFYX and LSGRX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison
NRFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than LSGRX's 2.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRFYX Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund | 3.20% | 2.24% | 4.51% | 2.66% | 3.05% | 5.98% | 3.81% | 17.61% | 10.05% | 10.64% | 11.02% | 9.66% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.51% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRFYX drawdown since its inception was -73.64%, which is greater than LSGRX's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRFYX and LSGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRFYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.64% | -63.63% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -17.83% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | -34.69% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.31% | -34.69% | -5.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -14.57% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -18.01% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 7.83% | -4.37% |
Volatility
NRFYX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) is 4.93%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that NRFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NRFYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 6.43% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 12.95% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 25.34% | -8.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 22.61% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 20.87% | -2.49% |