NRES vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NRES (Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRES is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while CRTC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. NRES is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. Over the past year, NRES returned 34.49% vs 14.54% for CRTC. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NRES charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

NRES vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRES achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 6.95% return.

NRES

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 5.89%
• 6M: 2.78%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 1Y: 34.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.91%

CRTC

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$258.18K	$628.52K	$497.75K
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	$30.73K	$18.46K	$20.92K

NRES vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	13.66%	27.08%	-3.05%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	6.95%	18.69%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NRES and CRTC is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.45

NRES vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRES	CRTC
Basic Materials	47.4%	3.0%
Energy	32.2%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.1%
Healthcare	1.2%	13.5%
Industrials	0.9%	13.4%
Communication Services	-	14.0%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Technology	-	39.6%
Utilities	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

NRES vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRES

NRES Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NRES Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NRES Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NRES Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NRES Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 37
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRES vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRES	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	0.92	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.31	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.16	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	1.42	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.70	4.45	+3.25

NRES vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRES Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRES and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRES vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRES drawdown since its inception was -22.22%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRES and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRES	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.22%	-19.07%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.25%	-9.05%	-4.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-2.76%	-3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-2.23%	-3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	2.88%	+1.57%

Volatility

NRES vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.66%. This indicates that NRES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRES	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	3.66%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	10.80%	+2.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	13.91%	+3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.03%	15.77%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	15.77%	+2.26%

NRES vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRES has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRES vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

NRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CRTC's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	2.50%	2.65%	3.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRES and CRTC in my portfolio?

NRES and CRTC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRES or CRTC?

NRES has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to CRTC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRES dropped -22.22% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, NRES or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, NRES leads with 34.49% vs 14.54% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRES or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, NRES has performed better with a 34.49% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRES or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRES or CRTC?

NRES has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.89% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between NRES and CRTC?

NRES is categorized as Natural Resources, while CRTC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for NRES and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.