NRES vs. URAN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NRES (Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRES is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. NRES is actively managed, while URAN is passively managed. Over the past year, NRES returned 27.15% vs 14.67% for URAN. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRES charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

NRES vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRES achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's -2.15% return.

NRES

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -5.25%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 6M: 9.71%
• 1Y: 27.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URAN

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: -4.70%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRES vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	9.86%	27.08%	-9.81%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-2.15%	49.05%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NRES and URAN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.43

Return for Risk

NRES vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRES

NRES Risk / Return Rank: 49
NRES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NRES Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NRES Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NRES Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NRES Martin Ratio Rank: 56

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 14
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRES vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRES	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.37	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	0.79	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.09	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	0.47	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	1.05	+8.46

NRES vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRES Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRES and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRES vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRES drawdown since its inception was -22.22%, smaller than the maximum URAN drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRES and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRES	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.22%	-31.96%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.74%	-31.02%	+21.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.74%	-25.72%	+15.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-11.16%	+5.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	13.96%	-11.10%

Volatility

NRES vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) is 5.68%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 13.39%. This indicates that NRES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRES	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	13.39%	-7.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	30.45%	-16.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.48%	39.70%	-22.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.14%	39.43%	-21.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	39.43%	-21.29%

NRES vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRES has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRES vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

NRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than URAN's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	2.58%	2.65%	3.23%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.62%	2.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRES and URAN in my portfolio?

NRES and URAN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRES or URAN?

URAN has higher volatility (13.39%) compared to NRES (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRES dropped -22.22% vs URAN's -31.96%.

Which ETF is better, NRES or URAN?

On 1-year performance, NRES leads with 27.15% vs 14.67% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NRES has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRES or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, NRES has performed better with a 27.15% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRES or URAN?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRES or URAN?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.58% for NRES.

What is the main difference between NRES and URAN?

NRES is categorized as Natural Resources, while URAN is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for NRES and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.