PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQCRX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCRX achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCRX has outperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 14.09%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


NQCRX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.04%
YTD
16.10%
6M
17.86%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
14.09%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
16.10%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCRX and FBLEX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.95

The correlation between NQCRX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQCRX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQCRXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.40

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.31

3.35

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.54

13.56

+9.98

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCRX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQCRXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.20

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.78

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.69

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.73

-0.34

Drawdowns

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCRX drawdown since its inception was -57.85%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCRX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQCRXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.85%

-39.73%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-6.89%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-14.71%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-19.00%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-39.73%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.20%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-3.83%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.70%

-0.08%

Volatility

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 2.69%. This indicates that NQCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQCRXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

2.69%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

7.89%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

10.50%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

14.79%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

17.40%

+1.53%

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQCRX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

NQCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.29%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, NQCRX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to FBLEX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCRX dropped -57.85% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQCRX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer