NQCFX vs. MRFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX).
NQCFX is managed by Northquest Capital Fund Inc. It was launched on Jan 15, 2002. MRFOX is managed by Marshfield. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015.
Performance
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund | -1.16% | 10.85% | 7.08% | 27.28% | -26.10% | 32.62% | 19.65% | 35.76% | -2.05% | 14.23% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | -2.97% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.
NQCFX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -3.19%
- 1Y
- 10.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
MRFOX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NQCFX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
NQCFX
MRFOX
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NQCFX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.33 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 1.75 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NQCFX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.33 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.92 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 1.07 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.06 | -1.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NQCFX and MRFOX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than MRFOX's 1.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund | 1.55% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 6.41% | 11.55% | 3.07% | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.42% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.67% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and MRFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NQCFX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -29.10% | -68.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -7.09% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.46% | -12.98% | -84.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.46% | -29.10% | -68.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.81% | -5.32% | -91.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.77% | -2.37% | -11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.77% | +0.75% |
Volatility
NQCFX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 3.04%. This indicates that NQCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NQCFX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.59% | 3.04% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 7.08% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 11.83% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,578.46% | 12.04% | +1,566.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,116.21% | 14.29% | +1,101.92% |