PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQCFX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 3.18% return.


NQCFX

1D
1.07%
1M
6.55%
YTD
22.33%
6M
20.91%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
11.94%

FSPGX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
3.18%
6M
1.86%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
22.33%10.85%7.08%27.28%-26.10%32.62%19.65%35.76%-2.05%14.23%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
3.18%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and FSPGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.88

The correlation between NQCFX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCFX
NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NQCFXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.32

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

4.33

+7.14

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQCFXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-32.66%

-64.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-16.17%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.46%

-23.32%

-74.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.46%

-32.66%

-64.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.05%

-5.35%

-90.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-6.36%

-8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

4.92%

-1.87%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.94%. This indicates that NQCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQCFXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

5.94%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

12.61%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

16.21%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,579.09%

21.61%

+1,557.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,116.65%

21.56%

+1,095.09%

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQCFX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.33%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
1.25%1.53%0.00%0.97%1.13%6.41%11.55%3.07%6.04%0.00%0.00%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQCFX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQCFX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to FSPGX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

NQCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQCFX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer