PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPRTX vs. NHINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPRTX achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than NHINX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NPRTX has outperformed NHINX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while NHINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.57% annualized return.


NPRTX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.44%
YTD
19.41%
6M
18.90%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
13.93%

NHINX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.83%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
4.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NPRTX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund
19.41%20.69%10.92%-1.76%-1.25%28.12%14.44%23.96%-1.23%13.45%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
1.17%8.39%7.94%9.92%-13.02%4.42%6.27%13.90%-2.63%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NPRTX and NHINX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1992

0.27

Over the past year, NPRTX and NHINX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPRTX vs. NHINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPRTX
NPRTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NPRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NPRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NHINX
NHINX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NHINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NHINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NPRTXNHINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.42

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

2.38

+3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.31

11.59

+10.72

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPRTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the NHINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPRTX and NHINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPRTX drawdown since its inception was -66.25%, which is greater than NHINX's maximum drawdown of -29.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPRTX and NHINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPRTXNHINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.25%

-29.47%

-36.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-2.72%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-3.89%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-16.38%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.01%

-22.85%

-16.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.13%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-3.75%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.56%

+1.16%

Volatility

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) at 0.91%. This indicates that NPRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPRTXNHINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

0.91%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

2.68%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

3.43%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

5.24%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

5.89%

+11.71%

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPRTX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NHINX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPRTX vs. NHINX - Dividend Comparison

NPRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than NHINX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
6.40%6.43%6.80%5.38%4.37%4.67%4.73%5.22%5.63%5.00%5.33%6.38%
NPRTX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund
5.38%6.42%2.19%2.45%1.56%5.04%1.60%3.87%14.44%8.55%3.58%9.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPRTX and NHINX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPRTX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to NHINX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPRTX dropped -66.25% vs NHINX's -29.47%.

NPRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPRTX and NHINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer