PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPFI vs. NUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPFI vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPFI achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than NUDV's 10.69% return.


NPFI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUDV

1D
0.97%
1M
2.25%
YTD
10.69%
6M
11.20%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPFI vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
1.68%9.21%6.56%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
10.69%10.77%10.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NPFI and NUDV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPFI vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPFI
NPFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPFI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NPFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPFI vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NPFINUDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.34

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.06

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

10.88

+0.95

NPFI vs. NUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the NUDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPFI and NUDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPFINUDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.95

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.66

0.65

+2.00

Drawdowns

NPFI vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPFI drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum NUDV drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFI and NUDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPFINUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-20.10%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-6.60%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-4.92%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.85%

-1.19%

Volatility

NPFI vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) is 0.75%, while Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that NPFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPFINUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

2.85%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

7.49%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

10.37%

-7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

14.97%

-12.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.95%

14.97%

-12.02%

NPFI vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPFI vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison

NPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than NUDV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
6.40%6.33%5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.25%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPFI and NUDV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDV has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to NPFI (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPFI dropped -3.18% vs NUDV's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, NUDV leads with 20.12% vs 7.77% for NPFI. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUDV has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 2.25% for NUDV.

NPFI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while NUDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NPFI and 0.26% for NUDV.

NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPFI and NUDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer