NPFD vs. NQ=F
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Preferred and Income Securities Fund (NPFD) and E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F).
Performance
NPFD vs. NQ=F - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NPFD vs. NQ=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPFD Nuveen Preferred and Income Securities Fund | 4.21% | 15.94% | 23.52% | -1.10% | -25.33% | 1.40% |
NQ=F E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures | -4.99% | 19.93% | 24.69% | 54.45% | -32.46% | 2.86% |
Returns By Period
NPFD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQ=F
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -4.99%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFD vs. NQ=F — Risk / Return Rank
NPFD
NQ=F
NPFD vs. NQ=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred and Income Securities Fund (NPFD) and E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NPFD | NQ=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.90 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between NPFD and NQ=F is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Drawdowns
NPFD vs. NQ=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFD | NQ=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.18% | -35.28% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -12.72% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -7.90% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -5.15% | -13.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.18% | -1.32% |
Volatility
NPFD vs. NQ=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NPFD | NQ=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.19% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.48% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.24% | — |