NOWL vs. TSLG
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
NOWL vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -55.17% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -20.82% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -15.19%
- 1M
- 53.22%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 6M
- -63.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- -20.82%
- 6M
- -21.35%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -55.17% | -42.58% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.82% | 79.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and TSLG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
TSLG
NOWL vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.34 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -82.86% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -60.00% | -16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -58.73% | +11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.63% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.33% | 92.53% | +10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 115.31% | -11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 115.31% | -11.98% |
NOWL vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 8.27% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and TSLG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for TSLG.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer