PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOWL vs. PTIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOWL vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOWL having a -47.14% return and PTIR slightly higher at -46.20%.


NOWL

1D
-12.28%
1M
84.18%
YTD
-47.14%
6M
-55.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PTIR

1D
-13.01%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-46.20%
6M
-46.23%
1Y
-21.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOWL vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NOWL
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
-47.14%-42.58%
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
-46.20%23.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NOWL and PTIR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOWL vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOWL

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOWL vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NOWL vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOWLPTIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.73

1.98

-2.71

Drawdowns

NOWL vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and PTIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWLPTIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.57%

-69.10%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.83%

-62.92%

-8.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-27.47%

-19.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.55%

Volatility

NOWL vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWLPTIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.34%

103.10%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.34%

129.58%

-27.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.34%

129.58%

-27.24%

NOWL vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOWL vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOWL and PTIR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PTIR is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 1.15% for PTIR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOWL and PTIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer