NOWL vs. PTIR
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
NOWL vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOWL having a -47.14% return and PTIR slightly higher at -46.20%.
NOWL
- 1D
- -12.28%
- 1M
- 84.18%
- YTD
- -47.14%
- 6M
- -55.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -13.01%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -46.20%
- 6M
- -46.23%
- 1Y
- -21.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -47.14% | -42.58% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -46.20% | 23.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and PTIR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
PTIR
NOWL vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | 1.98 | -2.71 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -69.10% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.83% | -62.92% | -8.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.40% | -27.47% | -19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.55% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.34% | 103.10% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 129.58% | -27.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 129.58% | -27.24% |
NOWL vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 10.80% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and PTIR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 1.15% for PTIR.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer