NOWL vs. PLTG
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.
Performance
NOWL vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NOWL having a -47.14% return and PLTG slightly lower at -47.23%.
NOWL
- 1D
- -12.28%
- 1M
- 84.18%
- YTD
- -47.14%
- 6M
- -55.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- -47.23%
- 6M
- -47.68%
- 1Y
- -24.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -47.14% | -42.58% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -47.23% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and PLTG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
NOWL
PLTG
NOWL vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -0.01 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -69.02% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.83% | -64.14% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.40% | -30.36% | -17.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.15% | — |
Volatility
NOWL vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.34% | 103.03% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 106.00% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.34% | 106.00% | -3.66% |
NOWL vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 34.37% | 18.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and PLTG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.37%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for PLTG.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer