PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOWL vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOWL vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NOWL having a -47.14% return and PLTG slightly lower at -47.23%.


NOWL

1D
-12.28%
1M
84.18%
YTD
-47.14%
6M
-55.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTG

1D
-13.32%
1M
-9.50%
YTD
-47.23%
6M
-47.68%
1Y
-24.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOWL vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NOWL
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
-47.14%-42.58%
PLTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF
-47.23%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NOWL and PLTG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOWL vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOWL

PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOWL vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NOWL vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOWLPLTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.73

-0.01

-0.71

Drawdowns

NOWL vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWLPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.57%

-69.02%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.83%

-64.14%

-7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-30.36%

-17.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.15%

Volatility

NOWL vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWLPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.34%

103.03%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.34%

106.00%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.34%

106.00%

-3.66%

NOWL vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOWL vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

NOWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOWL and PLTG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.37%, compared with 0.00% for NOWL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for PLTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOWL and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer