PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOWL vs. BIDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOWL vs. BIDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -62.15% return, which is significantly lower than BIDG's -37.73% return.


NOWL

1D
6.48%
1M
14.11%
6M
-56.11%
YTD
-62.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIDG

1D
-6.54%
1M
-6.11%
6M
-52.90%
YTD
-37.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOWL vs. BIDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NOWL and BIDG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOWL vs. BIDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NOWL vs. BIDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOWL vs. BIDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, which is greater than BIDG's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and BIDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWLBIDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-64.84%

-21.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.83%

-58.56%

-21.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.94%

-36.60%

-14.34%

Volatility

NOWL vs. BIDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWLBIDGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.54%

102.99%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.54%

102.99%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.54%

102.99%

+1.55%

NOWL vs. BIDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOWL vs. BIDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOWL nor BIDG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NOWL and BIDG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.

NOWL and BIDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for BIDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOWL and BIDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer