PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVZ vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVZ achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.45% return.


NOVZ

1D
0.65%
1M
0.12%
6M
6.06%
YTD
7.13%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.43%

XLRI

1D
0.16%
1M
1.35%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.22K$21.07K$191.46K
$84.19K$69.65K$65.16K

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and XLRI is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOVZ
NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVZXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.48

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

5.18

+3.30

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVZXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-7.12%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-7.12%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.62%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-1.54%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.03%

-0.35%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) is 2.56%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that NOVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVZXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.42%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

8.72%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

11.09%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

11.11%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.65%

11.11%

+1.54%

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOVZ vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than XLRI's 13.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NOVZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF
3.35%3.58%2.94%2.27%0.25%0.52%
XLRI
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
13.52%6.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVZ and XLRI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRI has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to NOVZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, NOVZ leads with 15.58% vs 10.59% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOVZ.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.52%, compared with 3.35% for NOVZ.

NOVZ is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOVZ and 0.35% for XLRI.

NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVZ and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer