NOVZ vs. JULZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) and JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) are both Options Trading funds from TrueShares. NOVZ is actively managed, while JULZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOVZ returned 11.35%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for JULZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVZ achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than JULZ's 8.79% return.

NOVZ

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

JULZ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 8.79%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	8.13%	13.03%	19.09%	18.06%	-9.58%	21.46%	10.30%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	8.79%	13.23%	18.76%	17.65%	-9.34%	20.66%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVZ and JULZ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020	0.99

The correlation between NOVZ and JULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NOVZ vs. JULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVZ

NOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
NOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
NOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOVZ	JULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.16	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.03	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.60	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	11.36	+2.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the JULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVZ and JULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOVZ	JULZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.16	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.93	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.15	-0.04

Drawdowns

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVZ drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than JULZ's maximum drawdown of -14.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVZ and JULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOVZ	JULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-14.71%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.72%	-8.53%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.63%	-14.71%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.62%	-14.71%	-1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.52%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-2.98%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	1.95%	-0.44%

Volatility

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) is 2.35%, while Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that NOVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOVZ	JULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	2.61%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.97%	8.05%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	10.25%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	12.19%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	12.32%	+0.39%

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NOVZ and JULZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

NOVZ vs. JULZ - Dividend Comparison

NOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than JULZ's 11.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.00%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%	0.00%
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF	3.32%	3.58%	2.94%	2.27%	0.25%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOVZ and JULZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, NOVZ and JULZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NOVZ or JULZ?

JULZ has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVZ dropped -16.62% vs JULZ's -14.71%.

Which ETF is better, NOVZ or JULZ?

On 5-year performance, NOVZ leads with 11.35% vs 11.28% for JULZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOVZ or JULZ?

Over the 5-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOVZ or JULZ?

NOVZ and JULZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOVZ or JULZ?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.00%, compared with 3.32% for NOVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.