PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOUGX vs. RFBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern U.S. Government Fund (NOUGX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOUGX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than RFBAX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, NOUGX has underperformed RFBAX with an annualized return of 0.76%, while RFBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.08% annualized return.


NOUGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.42%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
0.76%

RFBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.15%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
1.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOUGX
Northern U.S. Government Fund
-0.42%5.12%0.89%3.56%-8.38%-2.48%5.30%5.43%0.53%0.81%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
0.88%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NOUGX and RFBAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.60

The correlation between NOUGX and RFBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOUGX vs. RFBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOUGX
NOUGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NOUGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOUGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOUGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NOUGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOUGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern U.S. Government Fund (NOUGX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOUGXRFBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.51

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

4.53

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

17.94

-15.06

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOUGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the RFBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOUGX and RFBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOUGXRFBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.86

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.62

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.61

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.05

-0.18

Drawdowns

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOUGX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, which is greater than RFBAX's maximum drawdown of -8.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOUGX and RFBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOUGXRFBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-8.03%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.50%

-0.77%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-0.88%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.14%

-7.61%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.21%

-8.03%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-0.19%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-1.18%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.19%

+0.98%

Volatility

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Volatility Comparison

Northern U.S. Government Fund (NOUGX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) at 0.59%. This indicates that NOUGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOUGXRFBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

0.59%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

1.26%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

1.89%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

2.10%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

1.79%

+1.91%

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOUGX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than RFBAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOUGX vs. RFBAX - Dividend Comparison

NOUGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than RFBAX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOUGX
Northern U.S. Government Fund
3.34%2.57%2.86%2.45%1.06%0.25%3.38%1.81%2.31%1.44%1.28%0.83%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
3.04%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOUGX and RFBAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOUGX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to RFBAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOUGX dropped -13.21% vs RFBAX's -8.03%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOUGX and RFBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer