PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. NSGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOSGX having a 16.32% return and NSGRX slightly higher at 16.84%. Over the past 10 years, NOSGX has underperformed NSGRX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while NSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


NOSGX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.72%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.52%

NSGRX

1D
0.71%
1M
3.25%
YTD
16.84%
6M
16.28%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
16.32%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
16.84%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and NSGRX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1999

0.94

The correlation between NOSGX and NSGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. NSGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOSGXNSGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.45

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

15.55

-0.96

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the NSGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and NSGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOSGXNSGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.12

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.32

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.47

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum NSGRX drawdown of -64.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and NSGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXNSGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-64.89%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-8.66%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-26.45%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-32.31%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

-40.37%

-5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.21%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-22.17%

+13.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.45%

+0.15%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXNSGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.93%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

12.43%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

18.13%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

23.36%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

23.38%

+1.18%

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NSGRX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. NSGRX - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.82%, more than NSGRX's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.82%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
13.57%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NOSGX and NSGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NSGRX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to NOSGX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs NSGRX's -64.89%.

NOSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and NSGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer