PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOMIX vs. NOLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMIX achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly higher than NOLCX's 8.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMIX has underperformed NOLCX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while NOLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


NOMIX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.75%
YTD
15.87%
6M
13.79%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
11.60%

NOLCX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.59%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOMIX
Northern Mid Cap Index Fund
15.87%7.45%13.41%16.43%-13.42%24.47%13.59%25.94%-11.31%16.06%
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
8.71%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMIX and NOLCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005

0.90

The correlation between NOMIX and NOLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOMIX vs. NOLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMIX
NOMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NOMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NOMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOMIXNOLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.41

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

15.15

-3.52

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the NOLCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMIX and NOLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMIX drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, roughly equal to the maximum NOLCX drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMIX and NOLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOMIXNOLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-56.64%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-8.20%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-19.03%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-30.63%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-34.46%

-7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-1.91%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-8.83%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.83%

+0.57%

Volatility

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOMIXNOLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.52%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

9.51%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

12.36%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

19.16%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

19.30%

+2.53%

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOMIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NOLCX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOMIX vs. NOLCX - Dividend Comparison

NOMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than NOLCX's 7.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.89%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
NOMIX
Northern Mid Cap Index Fund
5.98%6.93%9.67%8.01%10.43%10.30%4.80%2.21%9.23%7.46%6.46%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOMIX and NOLCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOMIX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to NOLCX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMIX dropped -55.44% vs NOLCX's -56.64%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOMIX and NOLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer