NOMD vs. SAN.PA
NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) and SAN.PA (Sanofi) are both stocks. NOMD operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while SAN.PA operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, NOMD returned 2.48%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for SAN.PA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NOMD is traded in USD, while SAN.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SAN.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -13.98% return, which is significantly lower than SAN.PA's -3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has underperformed SAN.PA with an annualized return of 2.48%, while SAN.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.80% annualized return.
NOMD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- -13.98%
- 6M
- -12.86%
- 1Y
- -37.18%
- 3Y*
- -13.18%
- 5Y*
- -17.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
SAN.PA
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -3.72%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- 1Y
- -7.87%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | -13.98% | -22.15% | 2.39% | -1.68% | -32.10% | -0.12% | 13.63% | 33.79% | -1.12% | 76.70% |
SAN.PA Sanofi | -3.72% | 4.51% | 2.04% | 6.91% | -1.39% | 8.90% | -0.91% | 21.02% | 5.21% | 10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOMD and SAN.PA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOMD vs. SAN.PA — Risk / Return Rank
NOMD
SAN.PA
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Sanofi (SAN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOMD | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.97 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.45 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -0.90 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than SAN.PA's maximum drawdown of -47.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and SAN.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOMD | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.99% | -47.80% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.12% | -17.16% | -29.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.77% | -23.35% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.17% | -33.52% | -33.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.99% | -33.52% | -34.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.27% | -17.74% | -45.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.33% | -13.03% | -12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.68% | 8.68% | +23.00% |
Volatility
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Volatility Comparison
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Sanofi (SAN.PA) at 6.61%. This indicates that NOMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAN.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOMD | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 6.61% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 16.06% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.36% | 25.15% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.27% | 23.92% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 22.30% | +6.41% |
Dividends
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Dividend Comparison
NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than SAN.PA's 5.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | 6.52% | 5.44% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAN.PA Sanofi | 5.38% | 4.74% | 4.01% | 3.97% | 3.71% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 4.12% | 3.81% | 3.63% |
Financials
NOMD vs. SAN.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nomad Foods Limited and Sanofi. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NOMD and SAN.PA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NOMD and SAN.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer