PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOM vs. FASEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOM vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund (NOM) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NOM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FASEX

1D
1.68%
1M
3.56%
YTD
17.58%
6M
17.64%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOM vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOM
Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund
-5.66%6.89%27.11%-0.84%-26.11%8.91%1.20%30.63%-15.20%-3.04%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
17.58%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NOM and FASEX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.02

The correlation between NOM and FASEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOM vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOM

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOM vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund (NOM) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NOM vs. FASEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOMFASEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

NOM vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOMFASEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

NOM vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOMFASEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

Dividends

NOM vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

NOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, less than FASEX's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.48%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
NOM
Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.28%6.58%5.45%3.17%4.45%3.60%3.43%3.60%4.82%4.74%4.51%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOM and FASEX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOM and FASEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer