PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLCX vs. QUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLCX achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than QUERX's 5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NOLCX has outperformed QUERX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while QUERX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.


NOLCX

1D
0.93%
1M
0.49%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.60%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
15.03%

QUERX

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
5.74%
6M
4.79%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
9.18%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
5.74%6.98%13.98%9.55%-13.73%23.56%13.20%28.82%-0.21%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLCX and QUERX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between NOLCX and QUERX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLCX vs. QUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QUERX
QUERX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
QUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
QUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOLCXQUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

1.42

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

4.73

+10.79

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the QUERX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLCX and QUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than QUERX's maximum drawdown of -30.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and QUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLCXQUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-30.81%

-25.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-5.93%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-10.21%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-22.04%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-30.81%

-3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.33%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-3.91%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.77%

+0.06%

Volatility

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX) at 3.41%. This indicates that NOLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLCXQUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

3.41%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

6.23%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

8.37%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

13.05%

+6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

15.24%

+4.05%

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QUERX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLCX vs. QUERX - Dividend Comparison

NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, less than QUERX's 21.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.86%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
21.62%22.86%24.47%24.43%10.37%2.62%1.37%1.18%1.74%2.45%2.06%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLCX and QUERX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLCX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to QUERX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs QUERX's -30.81%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLCX and QUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer