PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLCX vs. NUSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLCX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than NUSFX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NOLCX has outperformed NUSFX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while NUSFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.


NOLCX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.09%
YTD
10.47%
6M
10.33%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
15.02%

NUSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
10.47%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%
NUSFX
Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
1.24%4.27%5.22%5.21%-1.59%-0.17%2.34%3.68%1.51%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLCX and NUSFX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

-0.05

The correlation between NOLCX and NUSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLCX vs. NUSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NUSFX
NUSFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NUSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOLCXNUSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

3.55

-2.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

11.18

-7.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

40.87

-23.40

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the NUSFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLCX and NUSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOLCXNUSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.14

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

2.09

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

1.94

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.78

-1.25

Drawdowns

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than NUSFX's maximum drawdown of -3.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and NUSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLCXNUSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-3.88%

-52.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-0.39%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-0.87%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-3.35%

-27.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-3.88%

-30.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-0.24%

-8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.11%

+1.65%

Volatility

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX) at 0.49%. This indicates that NOLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLCXNUSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

0.49%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

0.96%

+7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

1.38%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

1.32%

+17.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

1.21%

+18.04%

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NUSFX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLCX vs. NUSFX - Dividend Comparison

NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than NUSFX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.77%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
NUSFX
Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
4.18%3.78%4.09%2.86%0.97%0.71%1.52%2.42%2.09%1.42%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLCX and NUSFX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLCX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to NUSFX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs NUSFX's -3.88%.

NUSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLCX and NUSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer