PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLCX vs. NSITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLCX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than NSITX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NOLCX has outperformed NSITX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while NSITX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


NOLCX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.09%
YTD
10.47%
6M
10.33%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
15.02%

NSITX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
10.47%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%
NSITX
Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund
0.75%4.01%2.34%2.73%-3.74%-0.23%3.48%4.08%1.45%1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLCX and NSITX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

-0.06

The correlation between NOLCX and NSITX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLCX vs. NSITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NSITX
NSITX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NSITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSITX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NSITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSITX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOLCXNSITXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.83

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.47

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

6.81

+10.66

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the NSITX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLCX and NSITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOLCXNSITXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.50

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.64

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.97

-0.43

Drawdowns

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than NSITX's maximum drawdown of -7.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and NSITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLCXNSITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-7.08%

-49.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-1.48%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-2.29%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-6.44%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-7.08%

-27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.63%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-0.82%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.53%

+1.23%

Volatility

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX) at 0.59%. This indicates that NOLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLCXNSITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

0.59%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

1.16%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

1.42%

+10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

2.30%

+16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

2.27%

+16.98%

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NOLCX and NSITX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

NOLCX vs. NSITX - Dividend Comparison

NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than NSITX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.77%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
NSITX
Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund
2.44%2.51%2.51%1.56%0.85%1.61%2.76%2.44%1.43%1.35%1.31%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLCX and NSITX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLCX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to NSITX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs NSITX's -7.08%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLCX and NSITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer