PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIGX vs. NOLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIGX achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than NOLCX's 8.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIGX has underperformed NOLCX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while NOLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


NOIGX

1D
0.40%
1M
1.98%
YTD
11.10%
6M
10.44%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
10.10%

NOLCX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.59%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIGX
Northern International Equity Fund
11.10%37.46%4.73%19.04%-11.87%15.14%1.69%16.60%-15.11%22.90%
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
8.71%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIGX and NOLCX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005

0.78

The correlation between NOIGX and NOLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIGX vs. NOLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIGX
NOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOIGXNOLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.41

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

15.15

-3.57

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the NOLCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIGX and NOLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIGX drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, roughly equal to the maximum NOLCX drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIGX and NOLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIGXNOLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-56.64%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-8.20%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-19.03%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.48%

-30.63%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

-34.46%

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.91%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-8.83%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.83%

+0.73%

Volatility

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Volatility Comparison

Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) at 4.52%. This indicates that NOIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIGXNOLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.52%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

9.51%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

12.36%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

19.16%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

19.30%

-2.81%

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than NOLCX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIGX vs. NOLCX - Dividend Comparison

NOIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than NOLCX's 7.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOIGX
Northern International Equity Fund
0.70%0.78%4.50%5.79%2.94%3.20%5.86%3.83%2.71%1.21%1.57%2.02%
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.89%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIGX and NOLCX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIGX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to NOLCX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIGX dropped -57.92% vs NOLCX's -56.64%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIGX and NOLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer