PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIGX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIGX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 26.94% return.


NOIGX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.88%
6M
8.13%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
9.41%

FISZX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.11%
6M
19.86%
YTD
26.94%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NOIGX
Northern International Equity Fund
11.03%37.46%4.73%19.04%-11.87%15.14%1.69%3.86%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
26.94%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIGX and FISZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.85

The correlation between NOIGX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIGX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIGX
NOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOIGXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.75

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

10.47

-0.58

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIGX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIGX drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIGX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIGXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-39.92%

-18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-14.48%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-14.63%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.48%

-39.92%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-4.25%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-12.23%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.80%

-1.24%

Volatility

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern International Equity Fund (NOIGX) is 4.84%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that NOIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIGXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

9.85%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

19.78%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

21.91%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

18.51%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

18.64%

-2.42%

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIGX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

NOIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOIGX
Northern International Equity Fund
0.70%0.78%4.50%5.79%2.94%3.20%5.86%3.83%2.71%1.21%1.57%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIGX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to NOIGX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIGX dropped -57.92% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIGX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer