PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIAX vs. PZRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIAX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIAX has underperformed PZRIX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while PZRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.31% annualized return.


NOIAX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.27%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.81%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
7.08%

PZRIX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.07%
6M
17.95%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
1.38%32.80%-5.28%18.93%-15.88%8.73%4.06%24.35%-24.20%29.57%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
15.07%34.05%3.29%19.31%-9.11%12.08%1.74%15.94%-14.93%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIAX and PZRIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.86

The correlation between NOIAX and PZRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIAX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIAX
NOIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NOIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRIX
PZRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PZRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOIAXPZRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.53

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.17

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

15.05

-11.62

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the PZRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIAX and PZRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOIAXPZRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.96

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.66

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.61

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.61

-0.33

Drawdowns

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.97%, which is greater than PZRIX's maximum drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIAX and PZRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIAXPZRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.97%

-43.53%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-8.18%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-13.81%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-30.85%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-43.53%

-10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-0.76%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-8.89%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

2.26%

+2.24%

Volatility

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) at 3.09%. This indicates that NOIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIAXPZRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

3.09%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

8.89%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

11.54%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

15.78%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

16.94%

+5.49%

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIAX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison

NOIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than PZRIX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
3.06%3.11%2.96%1.72%1.77%1.55%0.24%2.99%4.56%1.04%2.07%2.77%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
5.70%6.56%6.70%9.19%8.80%11.99%2.04%6.32%2.80%4.13%2.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIAX and PZRIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIAX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to PZRIX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIAX dropped -53.97% vs PZRIX's -43.53%.

PZRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIAX and PZRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer