PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIAX vs. GTEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and Gateway Fund Class Y Shares (GTEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIAX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than GTEYX's 4.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOIAX having a 7.08% annualized return and GTEYX not far behind at 7.05%.


NOIAX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.27%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.81%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
7.08%

GTEYX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.41%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.13%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
1.38%32.80%-5.28%18.93%-15.88%8.73%4.06%24.35%-24.20%29.57%
GTEYX
Gateway Fund Class Y Shares
4.89%10.28%15.82%14.70%-11.84%11.49%7.19%11.12%-4.17%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIAX and GTEYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.67

The correlation between NOIAX and GTEYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIAX vs. GTEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIAX
NOIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NOIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GTEYX
GTEYX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GTEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and Gateway Fund Class Y Shares (GTEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOIAXGTEYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

2.59

-1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

3.79

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.52

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.07

-1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.43

14.61

-11.18

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the GTEYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIAX and GTEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOIAXGTEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.59

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.80

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.81

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.71

-0.43

Drawdowns

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.97%, which is greater than GTEYX's maximum drawdown of -16.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIAX and GTEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIAXGTEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.97%

-16.58%

-37.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-5.98%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-11.48%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-16.25%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-16.25%

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

0.00%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-2.06%

-9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

1.51%

+2.99%

Volatility

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Gateway Fund Class Y Shares (GTEYX) at 1.04%. This indicates that NOIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIAXGTEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

1.04%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

5.90%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

7.10%

+9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

9.56%

+10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

8.89%

+13.54%

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GTEYX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIAX vs. GTEYX - Dividend Comparison

NOIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than GTEYX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTEYX
Gateway Fund Class Y Shares
0.35%0.39%0.65%0.90%0.89%0.66%1.06%1.32%1.41%1.24%1.60%2.09%
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
3.06%3.11%2.96%1.72%1.77%1.55%0.24%2.99%4.56%1.04%2.07%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIAX and GTEYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIAX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to GTEYX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIAX dropped -53.97% vs GTEYX's -16.58%.

GTEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIAX and GTEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer