PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOG vs. TDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOG vs. TDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and Tidewater Inc. (TDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOG achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than TDW's 48.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NOG has outperformed TDW with an annualized return of -2.51%, while TDW has yielded a comparatively lower -4.85% annualized return.


NOG

1D
1.49%
1M
20.44%
6M
-12.08%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
-18.99%
3Y*
-13.95%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
-2.51%
ALL TIME*
-2.08%

TDW

1D
2.15%
1M
11.98%
6M
20.12%
YTD
48.60%
1Y
50.09%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
45.99%
10Y*
-4.85%
ALL TIME*
-0.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.84M$61.54M$65.18M
$41.43M$47.11M$55.89M

NOG vs. TDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
2.37%-38.20%4.84%25.54%54.51%136.72%-62.56%3.54%10.24%-25.45%
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
48.60%-7.68%-24.13%95.69%244.07%23.96%-55.14%0.78%-21.60%-77.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NOG and TDW is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2007

0.44

The correlation between NOG and TDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOG:

$2.30B

TDW:

$3.73B

EPS

NOG:

-$6.34

TDW:

$6.02

PS Ratio

NOG:

1.37

TDW:

2.76

PB Ratio

NOG:

1.17

TDW:

2.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOG:

$1.52B

TDW:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOG:

$450.66M

TDW:

$314.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

NOG:

$73.21M

TDW:

$489.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOG vs. TDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOG
NOG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TDW
TDW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOG vs. TDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and Tidewater Inc. (TDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOGTDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

1.73

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

3.60

-4.63

NOG vs. TDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the TDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOG and TDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOG vs. TDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, roughly equal to the maximum TDW drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOG and TDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOGTDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-99.80%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.43%

-29.10%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.08%

-70.35%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.08%

-70.35%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.15%

-97.27%

+5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.84%

-96.37%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.89%

-49.15%

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.41%

13.96%

+5.45%

Volatility

NOG vs. TDW - Volatility Comparison

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Tidewater Inc. (TDW) at 11.22%. This indicates that NOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOGTDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

11.22%

+5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.58%

30.87%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.31%

54.11%

-7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.16%

53.29%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.52%

66.15%

+4.37%

Dividends

NOG vs. TDW - Dividend Comparison

NOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, while TDW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
8.51%8.38%4.41%4.02%2.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%14.37%

Financials

NOG vs. TDW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. and Tidewater Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NOG and TDW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOG has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to TDW (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOG dropped -98.96% vs TDW's -99.80%.

TDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOG and TDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer