PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOG vs. SNOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOG vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOG achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 33.70% return.


NOG

1D
1.49%
1M
20.44%
6M
-12.08%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
-18.99%
3Y*
-13.95%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
-2.51%
ALL TIME*
-2.08%

SNOW

1D
-1.62%
1M
12.29%
6M
52.20%
YTD
33.70%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.84M$61.54M$65.18M
$1.36B$1.31B$1.77B

NOG vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
2.37%-38.20%4.84%25.54%54.51%136.72%60.97%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
33.70%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-57.63%20.38%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between NOG and SNOW is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.14

The correlation between NOG and SNOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOG:

$2.30B

SNOW:

$101.65B

EPS

NOG:

-$6.34

SNOW:

-$3.51

PS Ratio

NOG:

1.37

SNOW:

19.88

PB Ratio

NOG:

1.17

SNOW:

49.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOG:

$1.52B

SNOW:

$5.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOG:

$450.66M

SNOW:

$3.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOG:

$73.21M

SNOW:

-$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOG vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOG
NOG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOG vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOGSNOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.16

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.56

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

1.21

-2.23

NOG vs. SNOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SNOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOG and SNOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOG vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOG and SNOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOGSNOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-72.99%

-25.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.43%

-56.30%

+14.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.08%

-56.30%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.08%

-72.99%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.84%

-27.02%

-64.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.89%

-48.72%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.41%

26.11%

-6.70%

Volatility

NOG vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 9.54%. This indicates that NOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOGSNOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

9.54%

+6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.58%

52.74%

-19.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.31%

66.43%

-20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.16%

62.02%

-12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.52%

62.28%

+8.24%

Dividends

NOG vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison

NOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, while SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
8.51%8.38%4.41%4.02%2.86%0.75%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOG vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NOG and SNOW have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOG has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to SNOW (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOG dropped -98.96% vs SNOW's -72.99%.

SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOG and SNOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer