NODE vs. BIZD
NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. NODE is actively managed, while BIZD is passively managed. Over the past year, NODE returned 71.73% vs -12.94% for BIZD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
NODE vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -8.99% return.
NODE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 33.28%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 71.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIZD
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
NODE vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 33.28% | 32.44% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.99% | -3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NODE and BIZD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NODE vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
NODE
BIZD
NODE vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NODE | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.90 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | -0.58 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | -1.03 | +5.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NODE | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | -0.72 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.30 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
NODE vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NODE | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -55.44% | +20.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.35% | -22.22% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -19.27% | +16.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -6.72% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.00% | 12.63% | +3.37% |
Volatility
NODE vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.79%. This indicates that NODE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NODE | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 4.79% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.83% | 14.77% | +20.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.44% | 18.11% | +27.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 17.40% | +27.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 21.74% | +22.85% |
NODE vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NODE vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than BIZD's 13.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.87% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 0.84% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NODE and BIZD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NODE has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 71.73% vs -12.94% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 71.73% return vs -12.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 0.84% for NODE.
NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while BIZD is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.42% for BIZD.
NODE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NODE and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer